Bollywood actress Jacqueline Fernandez has suffered another setback in the high-profile Rs. 200 crore money laundering case linked to alleged conman Sukesh Chandrasekhar. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has strongly opposed the actress’s plea to become an approver, intensifying the ongoing legal battle.
The development has once again brought the controversial case into the spotlight, generating massive attention across Indian and Pakistani entertainment news circles.
ED Opposes Jacqueline Fernandez’s Request
During the latest hearing at the Patiala House Court in Delhi, the Enforcement Directorate submitted a detailed response against Jacqueline Fernandez’s application seeking approver status under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002.
The actress had approached the court requesting permission to cooperate with investigators as an approver in the case. However, the ED argued that her alleged role in the money laundering investigation was far more serious than she claimed.
According to the agency, Jacqueline was not merely an innocent victim but allegedly benefited from proceeds connected to the financial crime.
ED Claims Actress Benefited From Proceeds of Crime
In its court submission, the Enforcement Directorate described Jacqueline Fernandez as a “significant beneficiary” in the case. Investigators claimed that luxury gifts, expensive items, and financial advantages provided to the actress were allegedly purchased using money connected to criminal activities.
The agency further alleged that Jacqueline maintained communication with Sukesh Chandrasekhar despite reportedly knowing about his criminal background.
Officials argued that granting approver status to the actress could weaken the seriousness of the money laundering charges currently under investigation.
Questions Raised Over Statements During Investigation
The ED also informed the court that Jacqueline Fernandez allegedly gave inconsistent statements during multiple rounds of questioning conducted under Section 50 of the PMLA.
Investigators claimed they repeatedly confronted the actress with evidence linked to cash transactions, luxury gifts, bank dealings, and her association with people connected to the case, including Pinky Irani.
According to the agency, important information was allegedly withheld during the investigation process. The ED stated that these actions contradicted Jacqueline’s claim that she was unaware of the alleged illegal activities.
Previous Legal Challenges Also Failed
This is not the first legal setback for the actress in the ongoing controversy. Earlier in 2025, the Delhi High Court dismissed Jacqueline Fernandez’s plea seeking cancellation of the Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) and supplementary complaint filed against her.
Later, her challenge before the Supreme Court of India was also dismissed, adding further complications to her legal troubles.
The matter is currently at the stage of arguments on charges, making the upcoming hearings highly crucial.
Court Seeks Jacqueline Fernandez’s Response
The Patiala House Court has now asked the actress to submit her response to the ED’s objections. The case is expected to witness further legal arguments in the coming hearings.
The ongoing investigation continues to remain one of the most discussed celebrity legal controversies in India, with fans and social media users closely following every update related to Jacqueline Fernandez and Sukesh Chandrasekhar.
As the courtroom drama unfolds, the actress faces mounting pressure in a case that has already significantly impacted her public image and Bollywood career. The source of this news is Reviewit.